Pages

Sunday, November 11, 2012

Reactions


In his most recent post, Rabbi Slifkin reminisces about the theological impasse that results from traditional Judaism’s confrontation with evolution. He writes: 
One aspect of this that always puzzled me was, why did people care so much? Many of these people had no real interest in this topic, let alone expertise. It's not as though evolution poses any serious theological problems… Why do people care about evolution so much?
The answer is twofold.

1) Evolution does pose a serious theological problem. The most important message of the Torah – the fact of all facts – is that Hashem is the Creator. But the Torah doesn’t leave it at that. It delineates the specific details of Creation. The verses of the Torah make it clear that Hashem Created the world recently, rapidly, and supernaturally. In direct contrast, evolution maintains that the earth was initially formed billions of years ago, that it evolved over billions of years, and that the evolution of the earth was naturalistic. This poses a direct contradiction to virtually every detail of ma’aseh bereishis as depicted in the Torah and therefore undermines (chs’v), or at the very least throws suspicion (chs'v) on the Torah’s very claim of Creation by a Creator.

2) Evolutionary theory is actually an atheistic world view posing as science. Unfortunately, evolution is widespread in the popular media and is taught as scientific fact in all mainstream universities. Even governments have been influenced to act in promotion of its goals. Put simply; evolution is currently the most powerful tool in the furtherance of atheism and the philosophy of materialism (notwithstanding the misguided few that believe in the God of the Bible yet feel justified in adopting the evolutionary paradigm).  
Eventually I realized that it has very little to do with either science or theology. Rather, it was about the social aspects. For various historical (but not theological) reasons, evolution has become the signature area of battle between religion and atheism. It's "us" versus "them." My own involvement led to even more emotional social struggle: Loyal Followers of The Gedolim, versus Jews who are Against The Gedolim. This battle wasn't about science or theology; it was about personal identity. No wonder emotions ran high.
Rabbi Slifkin is not entirely wrong. Evolution has indeed become one of the primary fields of battle between religion and atheism, it is often attended by high drama, and yes, it is “us” versus “them”. But to say that it has little to do with science or theology is naïve. 

Eighteenth century European Enlightenment was a movement whose express goal was to counteract the abuses of the Church. And although it lost its momentum in the early 19th century, the need for reform persisted. When Darwin came along in 1859 and provided the world with a naturalistic explanation for the presence of complex and purposeful biological phenomena, they jumped on it! This is exactly what they were looking for; a way to counteract religious doctrine in order to undermine the authority of the Church. Darwin’s explanations provided the perfect tool. Once the presence of the world could be explained without recourse to a Creator, God becomes unnecessary and the Church becomes irrelevant.

The reality is, biological Evolution is specifically a non-theistic explanation for complex life and is actively used by the scientific community as a means of marginalizing the Bible’s teachings about God, Creation, Morality, Free Choice, the Divine element in man, and host of other religious principles. Evolution is an all-out assault on religion, nothing less. In this sense, the “battle” Rabbi Slifkin mentions above has everything to do with theology and science.

Rabbi Slifkin would like us to believe that the strident and ongoing Science/Theology debate can be reduced to immaterial causes such as “personal identity”, partisanship, and petty emotion. But these are not the causes; they are the effects. They are merely the results caused by Evolution’s powerful and sustained attack on the very heart and soul of religion. Unfortunately Rabbi Slifkin is either unaware of the situation “on the ground” or chooses to ignore it. Whatever the case, his continued attempts to integrate evolution into the very fabric of religion itself – in direct opposition to the stated opinion of all the current Gedoley Torah – is nothing less than tragic.

10 comments:

  1. The accusation is that charedim don't believe in evolution for social reasons. They have a societal bias against evolution and science. There is nothing inherently wrong with evolution theologically or scientifically, but Charedim ignore the scientific evidence that evolution happened and the theological evidence - ie. torah sources - which allow evolution to be compatible with Judaism.

    I believe the above is a slanderous lie.
    A great man once said that from the accusations of your opponents you can see their own faults.

    Sadly most people, frum or not, who believe in evolution, do so for social reasons. Everyone in their social circle believes and so do they. There are many things inherently wrong with evolution from a scientific point of view (e.g. fossil record is unsupportive and speciation has never been observed). But the evidence is either ignored or people are unaware of it. Theologically there are also serious problems - our mesorah describes a meta natural creation process lasting six days, which then stops - not a natural process lasting billions of years which is still occurring now. But people ignore the mesorah by focusing only on opinions which can fudged into their socially acceptable view.

    Evolution is not accepted by gedolim because it is untenable within the mesorah, as well as the fact that it is entirely without supportive evidence.

    Evolution is accepted by academics and their hangers on because that's just what people believe.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Evolution is accepted by many more, e.g. by the Talmidim of Rav Kook. Not because that is what people believe, but because we accept the truth from who says it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. While it is true that there are those that believe in evolution - despite being aware of the poverty of it's evidence - the clear majority of people who believe in evolution (yes, including orthodox jews), do so simply because society believes in it.
      Perhaps you are one of these few that do understand, fair enough, but you must admit that most do not - and this was the point of my comment. Charedim are accused of disbelieving in evolution purely on social lines, whereas the truth is that many many people believe in evolution purely for social reasons.
      By the way, let me ask you something. You said many of the talmidim of Rav Kook zt''l believe in evolution. But is that because Rav Kook believed in it and they believe whatever he believed or is that because these talmidim have evaluated the evidence and decided for themselves that it is true? And I ask you the same question reb yid, do you believe in evolution because your teachers believe in it, or because you independently evaluated the evidence?

      Delete
  4. I believe in evolution because I independently evaluated the evidence.
    As for Rav Kook, he believed that, if the evidence for evolution was overwhelming, one should accept it. It is clear that he had the tendency to accept it, for Kabbalistic reasons.
    Rav Kook is not just any Rabbi. The religious zionist it totally overlooked by Rabbi Coffer et al.

    ReplyDelete
  5. "I believe in evolution because I independently evaluated the evidence."

    And of course had you found otherwise you would have happily conceded that evolution was false despite the fact that talmidim of Rav Kook believe in it and despite the fact that most academics believe in it? If so, good for you. But you must admit you can't say the same for most people.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Of course. I would have been happy to say that evolution is false.
    I don't care much about "most people." The truth is with a very small group. This must be so, and the wise will understand.

    ReplyDelete
  7. "Of course. I would have been happy to say that evolution is false. "

    Jolly good.

    "I don't care much about "most people.""

    Quite right.

    "The truth is with a very small group. This must be so..."

    Must it? My dear friend, I am concerned with your comment. Let me tell you why.

    You said that you would be happy to believe in evolution or not - it is the evidence that matters.

    Then you said the size of the group means nothing to you because - "The truth is with a very small group".

    These two statements are contradictory. If a fact is true it is irrelevant how many believe in it. Just because everyone I know believes the Earth is round that lends no credibility to the tiny number of people who still believe in a flat Earth. They are wrong, whether there are 1 million of them or just 10. The truth, in this case, is with a very large group. So to, regarding human sacrifice. So what if you are in a small group? What does this matter?

    ReplyDelete